Involves a wide-ranging discussion of art. Of how knowledge can rule, which includes discussion of what Just city and a just person are in principle possible is an account The account in Books Five through Seven of how a Not that ethics and politics exhaust the concerns of the Republic sustains reflections on political questions, as Yet because Socrates links hisĭiscussion of personal justice to an account of justice in the cityĪnd makes claims about how good and bad cities are arranged, the Is a contribution to ethics: a discussion of what the virtue justice Poets’ claims to represent the truth and by offering a new myth thatĪs this overview makes clear, the center of Plato’s Republic Teachings of poets, he bolsters his case in Book Ten by indicting the

Of this point, and because Socrates’ proofs are opposed by the Then, because Socrates wants not only to show that it isĪlways better to be just but also to convince Glaucon and Adeimantus “proofs” that it is always better to be just than Socrates in Books Eight and Nine finally delivers three The just city and the just human being as he has sketched them are inįact good and are in principle possible. Through Seven, he addresses this challenge, arguing (in effect) that Socrates is finally close to answering the question after heĬharacterizes justice as a personal virtue at the end of Book Four,īut he is interrupted and challenged to defend some of the moreĬontroversial features of the good city he has sketched. Good city would be just and that defining justice as a virtue of aĬity would help to define justice as a virtue of a human being. Way around, sketching an account of a good city on the grounds that a To answer the question, Socrates takes a long This question, and Glaucon and Adeimantus make it explicit at theīeginning of Book Two. Plato’s Republic centers on a simple question: is it alwaysīetter to be just than unjust? The puzzles in Book One prepare for

The republic plato book